Why is it that when it comes to the Dharma gate, the most helpful time is when emotions are still interactive and arguments are still happening? The intensity of the response to the Dharma offering is also at its peak.
How does the logic of mutual influence operate within relational interactions?
Argument
It is when one person cannot accept another's behavior, yet still hopes the other will hear their heartfelt words, repeatedly resorting to verbal appeals.
The other side refuses to listen, disregarding you, and continues to do as they please.
The quarrelsome orator,
Then you see the other person's unwillingness to change. The restlessness, unease, and rage within. Resorting to harsher words or actions, or even violence, launching attack after attack.
Therefore, in our view, failed communication is never due to problems with the words themselves.
Rather, it stems from one party's selfishness and unwillingness to acknowledge the other's emotions, which creates tension in the relationship and can even lead to its breakdown.
Arguing is essentially
The fiery political martyr on stage, addressing the blind, deaf, and disabled individuals below.
老佛爺法門在一開始的介入最初?
The goal is to open the channel of "feeling" in the other person, enabling them to perceive our emotions. Through this practice, we continually soften the walls of their heart, allowing our partner to once again sense our emotional state. This process unravels the knots of selfishness that bind their closed heart, ultimately bringing about the transformation the practitioner desires.
This is a crucial factor in the transformation of the Dharma gate.
